INSIDE THE MAGNIFICENT (PRIVATE) FRANKFURT SCHOOL OF FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT |
VfM is a market-based concept in the eyes not only of consumers but of economists. In the way that economists love, it is given a different terminology - Benefit. To be precise, Marginal Benefit - the satisfaction derived by ONE PERSON from consuming ONE MORE UNIT of the product/service. Like Ice Cream, however, satisfaction typically reduces after the second, third....seventh unit. Typically, however, the average student only "consumes" ONE undergraduate degree...
Much to the frustration of economists, "satisfaction" is in the eye of the individual consumer. Who can tell what satisfaction individuals get from attending University? Do economic data tell us about how happy people are? Apparently not as accurately as downloading behaviour on such sites as Spotify.
So, can data actually tell us how satisfied students are?
- The NSS attempts this but there are so many methodological issues with its execution and the clear benefits of HE for the individual are certainly not known in the final year of study.
- Graduate Employment could be an indicator but many will be "satisfied" NOT working for a bean counting factory and so will not qualify as having a "graduate role".
And, I hear you say, what about "social benefit"? the benefit derived by society in supporting, mainly through taxation, a high quality education sector. Social benefit is a feature of market failure as consumers are less willing to pay for benefits that they do not feel directly. We know this because so many students do not wish to pay with their time to study or read unless it's going to be on the exam.
Ah, wait, here's a radical thought - why not stop thinking of Universities as corporate businesses with consumers seeking VfM and suppliers seeking profit by squeezing costs at the expense of quality?
Ah, wait, here's a radical thought - why not stop thinking of Universities as corporate businesses with consumers seeking VfM and suppliers seeking profit by squeezing costs at the expense of quality?