If it is relatively easy for new entrants to get into the industry and to compete with existing Universities then the "profitability" of incumbent players will diminish. I use Porter's terminology here - as he considers the pressures on profitability in commercial environments - rather than the measures that Universities prefer to use.
Picture by jscreationzs at freedigitialphotos.net |
Well - UKHE has its challengers too:
- Niche institutions such as The London Institute of Banking and Finance (LIBF)
- Alternatives to University such as apprenticeships (or even degree apprenticeships)
- Global delivery systems (MOOCs, as the tip of an iceberg of on-line resources)
- Commercial providers in mass market areas (BPP in Law, Accounting, Business...)
- A lack of conviction that a UK degree is a passport to a job in China
Yes, it is difficult to swim through the mire of regulation, legislation, funding, establishing "academic" credentials, but it is not impossible. Yes, it is a long term activity but then again, incumbent Universities did not appear overnight. The message is that the current market can, and will, be challenged.
So, Vice Chancellor, INNOVATE OR DIE. Don't be a bank. Don't rely on incumbency and dubious legacy benefits. Brand will tarnish if it is not constantly polished - and I don't mean changing the logo!
Next in the series will consider "Buyers" - just who buys Higher Education and how much influence do they have on the shape of it?
No comments:
Post a Comment