UK Higher Education prides itself on its robust, internally and externally verified assessment process but just how safe is that claim?
|PICTURE BY STUART MILES AT FREEDIGITALIMAGES|
Sitting on the Board is, perhaps, the most frustrating, least transparent part of the process as names, marks, mitigating circumstances, system errors, incomplete datasets and missing academics lead to a host of "Chairs' actions" which will be generally reported upon up to a year later.
And, just how are external examiners recruited? Are there minimum standards? Is it the first person willing to accept such a paltry sum for so much work? And just how much of the students' work do the externals see?
Having said that, many externals can, honestly, say that the institution they are reviewing matches the standards at their own!!
If the sector is not willing to police itself effectively then it deserves what it gets.